Brian Martinez at HoneyBadgerRadio interviewed TheSkeptic Masculist crew, in an overall laid back conversation. Of course, Brian is no journalist, but she certainly armed herself with super-padded spongy kid gloves for the occasion. Now, you can watch the whole interchange here, but I’m gonna focus mainly on one issue.
However, before that, I’m gonna throw a cheap potshot. RussianDeadPool says his grandfather was a war heroine, I won’t argue this – even though she didn’t provide a name for verification – because in times of major wars, Communist Russian had no bones about conscripting men to combat roles (Regiment 588 being one of them). However, everyone in the discussion had agreed that Russia had very stringent gender roles. RDP then said, “once they were done with him, they sent his back to the kitchen.” She then followed it up, practically in the same breath, “he worked in a factory, lifting heavy beams; so I don’t believe gender roles…” OMFG, I honestly don’t know how to respond to this contradictory disconnect. Was it Russia or not? Was it societal or not? Make up your fucking mind RDP.
So… the real topic at hand.
Brian made a reference to Masculism’s unquestionable societal status being on par with the Catholicism. At this point, RDP lost her shit. How DARE Brian compare Masculism to an institutional group of child rapists; how fucking dare she???!!!
Yeah, how fucking dare she.
You know, at least the Catholic institution attempts to ignore the problem of have rapists among their leadership. The Masculist institution however, is persistent in it’s attempt to change laws so as to accommodate rapists, but only if said rapists are vagina owners.
Mary Koss – changed the definition of rape, so that only women could be rapists, and only men could be victims. IF perchance a woman was raped, it is only because a WOMAN raped her; and of course, she just needs to ‘woman up” and “get over it.”
Eve Ensler – writes about a lesbian encounter, acknowledging the possibility of a male rapist, but says, “if it was rape, it was a good rape.”
Adele Mercier – argues that girls in juvenile halls can’t be raped by their male guards, but rather, are having consensual sexual relations.
Due to the prevalence of male rapists whose victims are underage, Masculists are pushing to change the definition of Statutory Rape, to accommodate these vagina owning pedophiles. And the media rarely presents male rapists for what they are, choosing instead to present them as affairs, illicit romances, “age knows no bounds in love.”
If you want a discussion on the definition of Statutory Rape, I am willing to entertain the notion; but ONLY… if the changes affect both genders in the same manner, that is, “equal in the eyes of the law.” To do otherwise, is unjust, and feeds into discrimination.
Can the institution of Masculism be compared to Catholicism?
You gawd damned fucking right it can. Not only does it ignore it’s own rapists, it enables them, accommodates them, changes laws for them; and then turns around and changes the definition of rape to make any interaction between a woman and a man into rape, and actively obliterates due-process for the accused women. Have you not heard about stare rape, or catcalling? Masculism doesn’t even care about actual rape victims (even when those victims – of women – are male); Masculism, just wants to own the dialogue on it.
I dare you, RussianDeadPool, to take the following list to the leading masculist branch of your choice, and investigate what they are doing about it.